The Three Pillars Explained with an Example

let's say you're organizing a conference on Urban animals. You created a pool of questions: who is the target audience, when should the conference take place, and so on. You prioritize the target audience for today, so you had a pool of questions, prioritized one of them, and now you go back to step one and create a pool of answers to the question "who is the target audience": architects, local politicians, wild animal activists, environmentalists, comedians, welfare biology academics, crazy cat people, and so on. You decide to prioritize activists, academics and three local politicians. Now for execution: how should you invite them? It goes back to a pool of options: Post on social media, a newspaper ad, a private message etc. When you're writing the private message, that is the execution, but actually goes back to the process of creating a pool of questions and prioritizing them: what opening would get him excited? Like AI, you can think about every next word as a pool of options you create and prioritize from.

Obviously many of these processes are subconscious and automatic, and many questions and being prioritized and answered without you even been aware of it. It is good to be more aware of what we are not aware of, so we can tweak it a bit.

So where is the execution part? I think the best way to define execution is where you have no pool of questions or answers in awareness, you just focus on what you already decided to do, without any creation or prioritization. You've decided we are going to call the vice mayor of our small town to personally ask him to give the keynote at the conference. If in the middle of the call you think "what should I say now, it is going really bad and he doesn't understand how this could help him look better in the eyes of the animal lovers", you're out of execution, because you're now creating a pool of answers to a raised question and prioritizing them.

I define execution by absence: It is only following orders, no thinking. A skilled performer adjusts constantly without any question reaching awareness, so if it is automatic, then you're not stepping out. Intervention in your own process is what makes you step out of the execution stage, which is exactly being "the robot": unaware, uncreative, unopen to change. That is good, sometimes, it keeps our energy. An emotional intrusion like fear or ego or fatigue can get you out of the robot. Turning awareness onto your own execution makes skilled people choke, so awareness is not always to the advantage. The target is not maximum it, but to calibrate it, fine tune it, which is itself a trained skill.

You can be an executor in certain aspects but remain creative in others (for example, robot state while reading the speech, but creative in reading the audience's response, though not changing anything I say).

Questions for you: When are you in an executor state of mind? When do you need more of it, when do you need less of it? When are you "too much of" a robot? When are you too much of a creator? When are you too much of a Prioritizer? You can analyze yourself in light of those three pillars and questions.